ViewsWatchers |
[add comment] [edit] Upload a Big Gedcom [3 January 2012]Hallo Dallan, A Friend Genealogist asks me to upload his Gedcom, but his Gedcom contains 15.000 individuals. His tree is a good addition to my tree, that's why i'd like to have his Gedcom on Werelate. I understand it's going to be a lot of work, but i have uploaded my own tree with a lot of individuals to, i now better understand how Werelate works. Could you give me permission to upload this Gedcom? JSFaber--Jsfaber 11:07, 3 January 2012 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] Error message on user talk page [23 January 2012]Dallan, User:Susan Irish mentioned that when trying to leave a message on a new user's talk page, she received the following error message "This site has restricted the ability to create new pages. You can go back and edit an existing page, or sign in or create an account." The user had not yet been welcomed and no messages appeared on his page. I can see the Add Topic link and can add a message, but Susan cannot. This is not the same message I get when trying to leave a message when not signed in, or on the sandbox when I use a non-admin account. I'm not sure why this might be happening. --Jennifer (JBS66) 16:15, 22 January 2012 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] Changes to search? [23 January 2012]It seems that changes have been made to search recently. As of 20 Jan I could enter the word Unknown in a given or surname field, and the pages with Unknown in the title would be returned. This is no longer working. --Jennifer (JBS66) 05:06, 23 January 2012 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] Deleting trees and watched pages [21 February 2012]Good morning Dallan. See Family:Kay Ottenberg and Unknown (1). The person page for Kay Ottenberg has been deleted. So the user who was watching the family page is now watching an empty page. Can we minimize the deletion impact by extending the "no deletion" of watched pages to the husband and wife if a person is only watching the family page?--Beth 07:56, 19 February 2012 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] FamilySearch links [11 March 2012]FamilySearch links from source pages have not been working for a few days. I get various errors, including "An error occurred on the server when processing the URL. Please contact the system administrator." If I change the Eng/Library to eng/library they work again. --Jennifer (JBS66) 12:05, 24 February 2012 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] Issue with Uploading GedCom [29 February 2012]Hi Dallan, I don't know where to put this - I am having trouble uploading my GEDcom (new user - your wiki is amazing - I can't wait to delve in!) So I uploaded my tree two days ago, and yesterday went through and corrected all the warnings and errors. I deleted that tree on WeRelate and uploaded the corrected one last night. It says in the instructions it should take 10-30 minutes but it has been several hours and it still says "PHELPS-Quinton_Hare-McAnelly2.ged Waiting for analysis". I deleted and re-uploaded in the first couple hours to see if that would fix it (it didn't) and it's just been sitting like that for hours now. It worked pretty quickly a couple of days ago, and the tree should only be faster now (fewer errors), so I'm wondering what I should do? Thanks for your help Marilyn--phel0049 05:58, 28 February 2012 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] Updating an image [8 March 2012]I've done some additional work on an image, and want to upload a better version of the one I already uploaded. On Wikimedia Commons one can upload improved versions of an image, but I don't see that option here on WeRelate. Is there a way I can do this? Here is the image I want to update: Image:Banks_Family_Home_in_Michigan.jpg. — Parsa 14:25, 3 March 2012 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] Urgent: GEDCOM Upload Merge Bug [17 March 2012]I am in the process of merging a GEDCOM file and just started encountering a bug in the last hour or less. Check out the history of the children in this family Family:Samuel Boreman and Mary Betts (1). It appears that 2 updates are being done on some of the children, and the second removes info, such as birth and death events, and in one case, a citation. I have manually fixed the data. I have not yet looked for a pattern, but wonder if it has something to do with whether or not the person has marriages (and the marriage is identified as a potential match in the same GEDCOM file). I checked out my contributions, and sure enough, they show the following:
This family is farther down in my GEDCOM family matches, and I have not yet processed it - yet it seems to be updating the record that I am merging (Samuel Boreman (6)) without me being aware of it. There are other records in my contributions like this. As far as I can tell, this issue started with this family. I merged 2 families before this one that included children with marriages (and it looks like I merged info on one of the children, Person:Mercy Boardman (1)), and the double-edit did not seem to happen. Hopes this helps with tracking it down. Let me know if you need more info. Another thing I have noticed in the last hour or so is that when I search WeRelate, I get all search parameters, not tailored to the namespace I am searching in (e.g., Person). This happened to me before when the javascript was not running correctly, when I was blocking the addthis webpage. As far as I know, I have changed nothing on my side, so I should not be blocking addthis, but maybe something else is getting blocked that is needed, or something else is interfering with javascript on my workstation. I'll stop doing merges until I hear from you. Thanks--DataAnalyst 21:08, 7 March 2012 (EST)
--DataAnalyst 23:24, 7 March 2012 (EST)
Merged some more records from my upload that appeared to have the same characteristics as the ones that had the problem. These ones worked correctly - only a single update and no data removed. I will keep going and let you know if I have any more issues. --DataAnalyst 21:13, 8 March 2012 (EST)
The bug of the double-update during a GEDCOM merge just happened again, on record Person:Samuel Wright (40). The first update was correct, and the second one removed the death date. I manually reverted to the version with the death date. --DataAnalyst 21:27, 14 March 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Modifying page date [17 March 2012]Hi Dallan, What is the reasoning behind adding an updated modified date to a person page when only the family page of the person has been updated? Sample is this page Person:Walter McManners (1) which I will update soon but have not when this message was posted. Thanks. --Beth 22:38, 13 March 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Places Tab "not matched" for "Facts" from Family Tree Maker gedcom [17 March 2012]Hi Dallan, Should I worry about this? I'm trying to eliminate all "not matched" places in my Family Tree Maker gedcom, but FTM allows "Facts" to be created with a field called "Place or Description". WeRelate is looking for a "Place" for all facts generating "not matched" if it cannot match a place. As an example, here is a fact for Military Service that is does not match a Place. (Military Service Fact) Enlisted as a Private in Verona, WI. Mustered into "K" Co. WI, 42nd Infantry. How should I handle an example like this? Is it better to leave it "not matched", or should I move this information into the "Notes" section and delete the fact? Thank you, Lou--Donkle3 09:55, 14 March 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Bug in transfer of family info to person page? [19 March 2012]Just did some work on Person:Joseph Daniell (4), now the names of his 3 wives are all blank in the display of facts (they are shown in the infoboxes). They do have the name fields filled in. I tried doing a minor edit and re-save of the page, and also one of the family pages, with no change. --Jrich 12:49, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Contained place [20 March 2012]Hi Dallan, due to a series of redirects, Place:Begraafplaats Eikelenburg, Rijswijk, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands appears as a contained place under both Place:Rijswijk, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands and Place:Rijswijk, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands. It should only appear under Place:Rijswijk, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands. I've tried null edits and deleting redirects, but I can't figure out why it's still showing up under Noord-Brabant. --Jennifer (JBS66) 19:04, 19 March 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Selecting tree during edit does not watch page [26 March 2012]If I click Trees from a page that I am not watching, and select a tree, the page is added to my watchlist. However, when I edit a page that I am not watching and select a tree before saving, the page is not added to my watchlist. I believe this is new behavior, as I've been able to watch pages in the past by selecting a tree during edit. --Jennifer (JBS66) 08:10, 24 March 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Searching Family Search [15 April 2012]Hi Dallan, Searching for James Luther Holder died in 1944 in Sabine Texas only brings up the death index searching all collections. Even added the name of his father. Finally found the death certificate image by removing the last name searching the specific database. He is listed as Halder. I noticed that you have changed the name variant pages. So I did confirm that Halder is a variant and saved. Hope these search improvements are added to the FamilySearch database. I don't have any confidence in my search capabilities and the search engines on any site. I cannot eliminate possibilities in research just because I have not found them; one of the frustrations in online research. However the benefits of online research outweigh the alternative of courthouse research.--Beth 20:09, 10 April 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Living People [24 April 2012]I have just recently updated my family tree on WeRelate by importing a new gedcom. I set the flags as 'Exclude details about living people' and 'Change name to 'Living. I was therefore expecting living people, like myself, to appear as 'Living' but without any details. However they haven't appeared at all. What have I done wrong?--Johnstona 17:41, 14 April 2012 (EDT)
Is this something which has happened recently? I restored a previous page and it records the wife as 'Living'.--Johnstona 17:09, 20 April 2012 (EDT)
The reason I restored the page was that according to my records the person (Simon Peter Dylke) was deceased but had not appeared in my latest GEDCOM upload. I wondered what data I had at the last upload but the restore shows that it is identical to the information I currently have. Why did it appear previously but not in the current upload? Also it is now floating on its own. How do I connect it to the rest of the family because the link is regarded as 'living'? Similarly the son (Simon Ronald Dylke) who is also deceased hasn't appeared. As a result of this I have disappointedly lost a lot of people who were previously published on WeRelate, making it less effective as these are the type of records where I have most hope of making connections with other trees. If I had known this was going to happen I might not have deleted the previous GEDCOM.--Johnstona 19:35, 21 April 2012 (EDT)
But the problem is that the person who links with the rest of my tree hasn't been imported because she is regarded as 'living'. She probably is deceased but I haven't got a date of death. As a result I can't add her husband (deceased) or children (deceased). Previously these people did appear on WeRelate because she appeared as 'Living' without any of her details appearing.--Johnstona 16:58, 22 April 2012 (EDT)
Very helpful - thanks very much. I'll go through my database and add these.--Johnstona 15:17, 24 April 2012 (EDT) [add comment] [edit] How do I see the code for ... [20 April 2012]How can I find the code behind the following? I tried findin by typing the "name(s)" below and also tried to find it as a template. {{{title-content}}} {{{title-header}}} {{{left-content}}} {{{right-content}}} What do the three curly braces indicate? Thanks ...--cowantex 22:29, 17 April 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Bug? [26 April 2012]There seems to be a bit of a bug in this agent - see [1] for an example. AndrewRT 17:11, 25 April 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] How to remove a spurious husband who hasn't a page [3 May 2012]http://www.werelate.org/wiki/Person:Ann_Moncrief_%281%29 refers. I've managed to merge the Ann and Annie MONCRIEF(FE)s that existed, one from a fellow researcher's upload and the one from my subsequent update. But there's this spurious "husband" sitting there, and is what stopped my merging Ann and Annie at import time. It's place name, not a person, and if I try to "edit" the family I'm told to create a page. I've been round that circle without solving this so far. Hints please!--LornaHen 21:58, 2 May 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] GEDCOM ?? [17 May 2012]GEDCOM ? - Just wondered if the last GEDCOM imported was okay . Have not heard or seen it yet merged into the Nash,Mahoney,Finn,Power,Ryan Family tree since upload a week or so ago . Thanks . --HFR100HFR100
[add comment] [edit] Next step: Review your GEDCOM [10 June 2012]You're not done yet! WeRelate is different from most family tree websites. By contributing to WeRelate you are helping to create Pando for genealogy, a free, unified family tree that combines the best information from all contributors. Now that you have uploaded test-name.ged, your next step is to review what your pages will look like, review any potential warnings, and combine (merge) people in your GEDCOM with matching people already on WeRelate. You need to review your GEDCOM before it can finish importing. We will keep your GEDCOM in the queue for two weeks to give you time to review it. Note: if your gedcom contains many errors or multiple families, we’d ask that you resolve and correct the errors, delete this gedcom and re-submit it without the errors before merging it with families already on WeRelate. If the gedcom is very large, we’d suggest breaking it up into separate files (or families) and importing them one at a time, which makes the review and correction process easier. Click here to review your GEDCOM Once you have finished your review and marked your GEDCOM Ready to import, one of our administrators will review your GEDCOM and finalize the import. This usually happens within 24 hours. You will receive a message here when the pages have been created.
[add comment] [edit] Redirects in trees [12 August 2012]Hi Dallan, it appears that page redirects created by a merge still appear in trees (they appear in the tree total # under Manage Trees and in FTE but not in search). Is it possible to remove the redirect page from the Tree during a merge? --Jennifer (JBS66) 13:26, 25 June 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] MediaWiki:Place types [29 August 2012]Dallan What I meant was: can you put a link to MediaWiki:Place types on the editing screen of a place page--right beside the box for "Type"? I have bookmarked MediaWiki:Place types for my own use in the interim. Editing suggestions:
There are plenty of others, but those are the ones I remember from a browse earlier today. Don't know whether you have seen my Portal proposal for a cleanup of Ontario (Canada) places. Ottawa is now done and some early-in-the-alphabet counties. /cheers --goldenoldie 11:36, 1 July 2012 (EDT)
I'll add a link to MediaWiki:Place types next month when I get off vacation.--Dallan 19:40, 12 August 2012 (EDT) Last week I had a go at sorting out the list of MediaWiki:Place types. This was done "off-piste" and when I work out how to set up a spreadsheet table in wiki-speak I will present it. But one point that is outside the list itself is that some descriptions fall into the general category of Inhabited Places and some don't.
Just a couple of other quickies:
because that's the way population usually grows.
Continue to have a good holiday. --goldenoldie 14:02, 22 August 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Bible records [12 August 2012]Hi I was wondering if we have a category for "Family Bible Records"? I was thinking it would be nice to be able to check and have them in one place. --Txbluebell6 08:08, 11 July 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Updating GedComs [13 August 2012]Dallan, I'm considering resubmitting my Gedcons to We Relate. They hav'nt been updated sense 2010, and I have added a number of people and families. To do this should I first remove my existing tree, and then proceed with the new expanded Gedcom upload, or can I upload the new without removing the existing? Jim Tarbet--Tarbet 12:24, 12 July 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Place redirects appearing in drop-down boxes [12 August 2012]Hi Dallan, a few weeks ago, I renamed Place:Friesland Cemetery, Columbia, Wisconsin, United States to Place:Friesland Cemetery, Friesland, Columbia, Wisconsin, United States. I am wondering why both places are still showing up in the drop-down boxes. Thanks, --Jennifer (JBS66) 17:25, 12 July 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Family from Germany [12 August 2012]I have several Germanic families. What part of Germany does the ones your searchin for come from. Mine are mainly out of what is now the state of Rhineland Pfalz but was known as the Palatine, Hesse, and Germanic Switzerland. Ben--Treeshaker55 14:44, 11 August 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Special Gedcom [19 August 2012]Hi Dallan: I have a special file for pre 1650. As I'm a descendant of Edward Goddard and is connected to many noble and royal famlies of Europe which has been proven. If possible I could post this Gedcom but asking first before attempting.Its a work in progress because so much intermarriage of famlies.But I wonder if others would be intersted to link with that Gedcom for those truly interested in history? Just need a go or no go :>). I m still trying to clean up on the maternal line of both parents before attemptin a gedcom.--Treeshaker55 11:22, 18 August 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Possible flash problem [1 September 2012]Dallan, are you aware of possible problems with the latest version of Flash as they relate to FTE? I've never had a problem moving the vertical divider in FTE, so as to narrow the column of names on the left and widen the page being displayed on the right -- until now. As long as I don't touch the divider with the mouse, it's okay, but the instant I try to click on it, it locks up not only FTE but the whole tab that WeRelate is displayed in. I basically have to reboot the browser to get back to what I was doing. I don't seem to be having problems with other websites that use Flash. My version of Flash 11 is 11.2.202.235, downloaded in May -- I think that's the current one. --MikeTalk 17:32, 27 August 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Minor issue: user id lost by system [22 September 2012]Logged in (user id displayed at top), perform "watch" on a page, page refreshed with banner saying you are now watching this page, but top now says "Sign in" and any attempt to do anything requires new login. Use back arrow, return to last page logged in, now am able to resume work, system thinks I am logged in still. Logged in, type search criteria into search box. Get to new page, top now shows "Sign in" and must login to edit. However, back up to page where last logged in, follow a link to same page, get there and I am still logged in and able to edit. ??? --Jrich 16:40, 2 September 2012 (EDT)
I'm able to reproduce the no-longer-logged-in problem if I visit a "werelate.org" page (without the www) and click on watch, because it takes me to "www.werelate.org" and my cookie says I'm logged into werelate.org, not www.werelate.org. So I made a change to force all "werelate.org" URLs to automatically rewrite themselves as "www.werelate.org" from now on. That solves that problem at least. Does it solve yours as well?--Dallan 18:11, 22 September 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Possible change in bot that processes source-wikipedia template [17 September 2012]I'm taking the liberty of reproducing below an exchange I had w/Amelia:
So - long and short of it - can you add the show_source_images_notes tag to the substitution? When appropriate? Thanks!--jrm03063 08:41, 6 September 2012 (EDT) Any chance that the <show_sources_images_notes/> XML tag could just be embedded in the wikipedia-notice template? I tried to make a test that would do that, but I'm afraid my wiki syntax wasn't up to the task. --jrm03063 11:06, 7 September 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] New User and Impressed [1 December 2012]I am new to the wiki, but have been very impressed so far. I have used One Great Family for years and became very dis-heartened when data that I had cleaned up a week before was messed up again. My full line built very fast there and I connected with royalty which sent my line all the way back to Adam by several routes. But I could not download more than a few generations at a time. Large tree sections would take days to try and download. Often the downloads contained zombies, (living people 150 to 6,000 years old). Since they were living their data was not downloaded, just the word "living" and perhaps a surname. I find the review process of WeRelate very encouraging. Errors are being corrected before trees are connected. This process also helps us to update our data on our home computers and in our favorite genealogy program. One Great Family, Ancestor.com, and Family Search, and others all just take the gedcom, as it is, and upload it. Errors, zombies, and all are dumped into the database. error corrections are never permanent, and error builds upon error. One of my Thomas Barneses had hundreds of children with different last names. It became impossible to clean up. You are doing a great job.Keep it up. Ron--Rgbarnes 11:40, 20 September 2012 (EDT)
I'm also a new user of WeRelate, and as the first user am very impressed with the error correction and clarification process before a gedcom is accepted into the system. It gives me great confidence that any information I gleam for these trees will be well-researched and documented.The site found many errors in my gedcom that had slipped through the cracks till now, and I appreciate getting them corrected in my tree. NOW FOR MY QUESTIONS: First--is this the proper forum to post my questions about anything I can't figure out how to do? Second--I think I've completed going through my gedcom and correcting/documenting everything in all the tabs. Now, how do I indicate I think it's ready to be considered to be a part of the site? I can't find any tabs/menu items that seem to do that. Thanks so much for everything and I look forward to hearing the answers.--Jaynes931 18:32, 23 November 2012 (EST)
I'm already enjoying having my tree actually on the site. It's so exciting to learn the things that other people have already researched about my family. Thank you so much for your help. I've noticed a couple of typos in some of my comments and I figure there's a way to edit them, but so far I haven't figured out how. Is there a tutorial teaching me how to use my wonderful new tool? Thanks again, Mary Jean--Jaynes931 00:20, 1 December 2012 (EST)
[add comment] [edit] Massachusetts Vital Records Project [23 October 2012]I sent you some email a while back indicating that I was talking to John Slaughter, steward of Massachusetts Vital Records Project. With data that he provided, I've created a couple of sample transcript pages from the Vital Records for Bradford, Massachusetts, in particular - page 61 and page 215. I would like to know if I can tentatively expect support like that which you provided for Savage. Thanks.--jrm03063 15:12, 23 October 2012 (EDT)
[add comment] [edit] Duplicate Image [4 November 2012]I have tried to add a few images. I was having trouble in the beginning but I did work through my confusion. I have 2 of the same images in my file and ask that one of them be deleted. The image is Paul Baier-1867-pg 331, Line 7(pdf file). It was created on 28 oct 2012. I saw a note that send to send a link to the image, but I don't know how to do that. Thank you. Sharon Reynolds Connolly--SharonReynoldsConnolly 10:08, 4 November 2012 (EST)
|