ViewsWatchers |
[edit] IntroductionThis is an overview of the process of reviewing source pages. I'm thinking this page will link to additional pages that will focus on the specific issues that come up with various categories of source pages. See WeRelate:Current Source Projects for information on current source projects. See the Related Links section, below, for more detailed discussion of various types of source pages. [edit] Defining Scope of ProjectGeographic entities are a convenient way to generate a subset of WeRelate source pages for review, but they are certainly not the only way. One could take on a source page review project of all pages of a particular type, a particular subject or even a particular time period. Keep in mind that any of your searches will be limited, because not all the titles that might be in the purview of your study will have the particular field you are searching on filled in, or filled in correctly. That being said, a geographic area search is probably the most likely to be comprehensive if you are doing a delimited search. It is also possible to use the "Key word" search field to search as broadly as possible for the topic or area you are choosing to search. This method practically guarantees you will get titles that are not applicable to your area of interest, but it is less likely to leave out source pages that you are interested in but that are not coded properly. For example, a search for sources with "Maine, United States" or just "Maine" in the Place field returns 3,720 source pages. A search for Maine in the keyword field returns 5,237 sources and includes sources in Maine, France and sources where the book was published in Maine but does not concern a Maine-related topic. However, this search will also reveal pages with Maine in the title, like family histories/genealogies, that may not have the Places field filled in. [edit] Tasks to consider in Source Page reviewThis list is not necessarily comprehensive (tho I hope with additions by others it will become more so!). Nor must all these items be addressed when reviewing source pages -- some elements will already be completed on most source pages, and users who take on a Source page review project may decide to limit their scope to specific tasks. The goal is to describe the possible elements in a source page review project and provide guidance on the issues that might arise. [edit] Reviewing pages for content:Are the type and subject fields filled in (correctly)? Is there a date range that can be identified and filled in?
[edit] Review Source Page name formatIs the format of the source page name consistent with the rules we identified last year? See Help:Source page titles for details. WeRelate:Source renaming project has a convenient table showing the rules for different types of source pages. The most common changes include:
[edit] Reviewing and correcting bibliographic information:When a title has been imported from the Family History Library, it often contains only the microfilm bibliographic information. See Example 1, below. WeRelate's policy is to generally refer to the first publication information for the source (or, if there are multiple editions of a source in WeRelate that are not combined, the first publication of the applicable edition). Original publication info can often be found in the FHLC entry (see the Notes field) or WorldCat. See Example 2, below. Sources that were imported from Ancestry may have missing data in the publication fields, and many of their older (out-of-copyright) sources have a default publication date of 1992, which should be corrected. Special issues:
These are issues that have not yet been discussed/decided by the wiki as a whole; my notes here reflect only my practice at this point, so feel free to make a better suggestion or question my decisions! [edit] Add Repository information:I use a separate browser window with (at least) WorldCat, Internet Archive and Google Books to add alternate ways a user might obtain a source. WorldCat provides information on libraries (mostly larger institutional libraries); the Internet Archive and Google Books provide online copies of out-of-copyright books. Google also often has "limited previews" available of current academic titles in particular. Depending on the source, I might also add specialized libraries, like the DAR Library. I use the Family History Library information on where they obtained the source to give me clues as to where the original might be held (for example, if Family History Library entry states the original was microfilmed at the Maine Historical Society, I'll add the Maine Historical Society to the repositories, with details if I can obtain them). Adding repositories might also lead you to add some additional text as well. There is a template I place in the text field when I add WorldCat to the repositories for a source. See Template:WorldCat. It can be added to a source page by typing {{WorldCat}} in the text box. Some of the commonly used repositories are: Internet Archive, Google Books, WorldCat, Family History Archives, and HathiTrust. Examples of added Repositories: [edit] Add content information:Particularly when reviewing source pages with generic titles (like Town Records of XXX), I add some details from either an online version of the title, or from the Family History Library catalog entry (often additional details are on the "film notes" page). Details can be added next to the film numbers, or can be added as a bulleted list. Examples of added content:
[edit] Remove Duplicate Sources:There are still plenty of duplicate Source Pages - review your search results for possible duplicates and merge as needed. To merge duplicate source pages:
There is some help text about redirecting pages here. There are some special circumstances that can apply to duplicate sources: [edit] Duplicates that are multiple editionsIf you are merging duplicate sources that represent multiple editions of the same source book, be sure to add the "multiple edition" language (This source may refer to multiple editions of the same book. If it is important to you to refer to a specific edition, you may create a separate Source page for that edition with the year of the edition in parentheses after the title.) when applicable. This is a WeRelate template (Template:MultipleEditions). To use the template, place {{MultipleEditions}} in the text box. [edit] Duplicates where the original source has been used on Person or Family pagesThe #redirect[[title here]] command will send any links from the page you are merging to the single Source Page that remains after merging, but sometimes we end up with a redirect to a redirect to a redirect, which can cause problems. Generally, WeRelate administrators will be keeping an eye on these and and fixing them, so no special action is required, but if you are comfortable going the extra mile, here are the steps for "cleaning up" the links to the now-redirected Source page:
This "cleans up" the Source Page/Person-Family Page link and prevents possible multiple redirects. [edit] Disambiguate and Cross-Reference:If there are multiple editions that shouldn't be merged, I fix the source page names to disambiguate, and add information on both source pages to provide a link to the alternate edition. Cross-referencing is also really helpful when there are title/publisher variations over a period of years in the directories for a particular area, or when a periodical changes its name or merges with another periodical. I also cross reference indexes and the main publication. Examples of cross references:
[edit] Add categories:Finally, I add categories to the pages where appropriate. This is particularly helpful when a source could be identified with more than one subject. Adding a category allows you to indicate other possible uses for the source. See Help:Categories for further information on Categories at WeRelate. This page explains the format used to add a category to a page. See also WeRelate:Category index for a useful outline of existing categories and the available (more specialized) subcategories that you might wish to use. Generally the Categories for a page are the last items in the text box, and are entered as [[Category:(''Category Name here'')]] WeRelate has had a variety of discussion and permutations of the Subject vs. Category question as tools for sorting and viewing related sources. I don't know if there are definitive answers yet. Some categories, such as [[Category:Vital records]], will ultimately benefit from have geographic subgroups automatically added to the category (i.e. Vital Records in Maine would be a different subgroup than Vital Records in West Virginia). Since I don't yet know at what level these geographic subgroupings will be applied (they can be auto-generated), I have been adding the current applicable categories to source pages even tho they are fairly generic and duplicative of the Subject field. Commonly used categories include:
[edit] Example 1: WeRelate Source page Before Review[edit] Example 2: Related Family History Library Catalog Entry[edit] Related Articles
|